Wednesday, January 22, 2020

Alfred & Robert

Tuesday, 22 - January - 2020
Alfred Tennyson & Robert Browsing

Hello Reader...



Today I shared one new blog with you. This blog about best to Poet Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browsing. Both are the best Poet in his time period. This blog task given by our Professor Vaidehi Hariyani Mam. Her style of study is diffrent but I like that very much. Click here for her Blog link of Wordsworth and Coleridge comparison. And also I will also share my blog link in this blog which is the same as mam on Wordsworth and Coleridge which I will also share last in this blog.

Alfred Tennyson




Alfred Tennyson was born August 6, 1809, in Lincolnshire, England, to George and Elizabeth Tennyson. The family was very large; eleven children reached maturity. Alfred's father was not wealthy, as his grandfather had made his younger son Charles his heir, leaving George to enter the ministry. Tennyson often worried about money throughout his life. Several of Tennyson's family members also struggled with alcoholism and mental illness, including his father, who grew violent and paranoid from excessive drinking in the 1820s.

At this time Tennyson composed the strange and mesmerizing "Timbuctoo," which attracted the notice of other young intellectuals. Tennyson was invited to join the Apostles Club in 1829, which included Arthur Henry Hallam, James Spedding, Edward Lushington, and Richard Monckton Milnes. These men would be his friends his entire life (except for Hallam, who died young). Hallam and Tennyson were particularly close, and the former became engaged to Tennyson's sister Emily after he met her on a visit to Somersby.

In 1830 Tennyson published Poems, Chiefly Lyrical. The volume included poems such as "Mariana," "The Kraken," and "Ode to Memory." "Mariana" is one of Tennyson's most beguiling and justly famous works. Reviews of this volume were generally favorable. In 1832 Tennyson published Poems, which included "The Lady of Shalott," "The Lotos-Eaters," "The Palace of Art," and "Oenone." Unfortunately, the reviews were brutal and damning, and Tennyson, sensitive to criticism, was crushed.

Hallam's death in 1833 at the age of 22 was another profoundly devastating blow to Tennyson. This death, his sister's despair over her fiancé's death, the terrible reviews, his father's death, his poverty and isolation in the country where he resided, and his own fears about mental illness and addiction pushed him into depression. He said of this period, "I suffered what seemed to me to shatter all my life so that I desired to die rather than to live." Many of Tennyson's most famous works of poetry were influenced by his immense grief even though they were not uniformly pessimistic. These included "Ulysses," "Tithonus" and, of course, the monumental In Memoriam A.H.H..

Tennyson became engaged to a young woman, Emily Sellwood, but fears about his financial situation and his possible mental problems led him to break off the engagement in 1840. During this time he was rather itinerant, moving about a great deal, and some of those closest to him thought his poetic genius had evaporated. In 1842, however, he published Poems, which contained some work from 1830 and 1832 that had been revised as well as new work; these two volumes provided the basis for his excellent reputation and secured his fame.

A government pension in 1845 alleviated some of his financial distress, and he married Emily in 1850. In 1847 he published "The Princess: A Medley," and in 1850 he finally published In Memoriam anonymously. Subsequent editions of that poem brought Tennyson a great deal of fame and money. The death of Wordsworth in 1850 seemed to designate Tennyson as his poetic successor, and indeed, in 1850 he was made Poet Laureate of the United Kingdom. Alfred's and Emily's first son, Hallam, was born in 1852, and a year later they established a home in Farringford, the Isle of Wight. A second son, Lionel, was born in 1854. "Maud, and Other Poems" was published in 1855, The Idylls of the King was published in 1859, and Tennyson published various other poems throughout the next decade.

Tennyson was admired by Prince Albert and Queen Victoria. The Queen described her first impression after meeting him: "very peculiar looking, tall, dark, with a fine head, long black flowing hair & a beard, — oddly dressed, but there is no affectation about him." Tennyson accepted an offer of barony in 1883 and took his seat in the House of Lords in March 1884. He also was awarded honorary degrees from Oxford and Edinburgh, and he made friends with other luminaries such as Charles Dickens, William Gladstone, and Robert Browning.

Lord Tennyson was frequently ill throughout the 1880s. He suffered immensely once again when his son Lionel died at age 32 in 1886. On October 6, 1892, Tennyson died. He is buried at Westminster Abbey.

Robert Browning


Robert Browning was a celebrated English poet of the Victorian era. Born on May 7, 1812, in Camberwell, South London, in England, Browning was the only son of affluent parents Robert Browning Sr. and Sarah Anna Wiedeman. His father was a clerk at the Bank of England and earned a handsome salary. His paternal grandfather was a rich slave owner in Saint Kitts in the West Indies, where Browning Sr. also went to work. Browning’s father returned to England, though, after being revolted by slavery and becoming an abolitionist. Browning’s maternal grandfather was a German ship-owner, whose family settled in Dundee, Scotland.

Browning’s father had a collection of approximately 6,000 books, and Browning developed a keen interest in reading and writing. Raised in such a literary household, Browning gained creativity from his family, and started writing poetry at the young age of 12. His sister, Sarianna, who was also gifted with artistic talents and a musical mind, worked with her brother on many creative projects. Meanwhile Browning’s father further encouraged his literary pursuits.

Given Browning’s literary upbringing, it was natural for him not to feel satisfied by the private schools where he was sent to study. Discontented, Browning left school and set about getting education at home through a private tutor. By the age of fourteen, he had became fluent in Greek, French, Latin, and Italian from reading books from the library his father set up at home. Romantic poets like Shelley and Lord Byron inspired him the most during these years. In order to further his knowledge, Browning attended the University College London to study Greek, but left after a year. His parents’ evangelical faith prevented him from studying at Oxford or Cambridge University.

In 1845, he met a poetess, Elizabeth Barrett, and they developed a romantic relationship, which led to their marriage. The couple took a trip to Italy in hopes of improving Elizabeth’s health. They kept their wedding a secret due to fear of Elizabeth’s father, who did not approve of marriage for any of his children. Elizabeth’s father disowned her when he learned of the marriage, and the Brownings stayed in Italy until Elizabeth’s death. It was during this time that Browning became highly creative and productive in his writings. Unfortunately, his wife passed away in 1861, leaving behind a son.

Browning returned to England with his son, and became an important part of literary circles there. After five years of hard work in England, he published his popular poetry book “The Ring and the Book” in 1868. Following this, Browning started publishing frequently and, in 1870, he released his series of long poems “Red Cotton Night-Cap Country” and “Balaustion’s Adventure.” Browning died in Venice at the residence of his son on December 12, 1889.


Robert Browning’s Works
Browning worked very hard on his poems during his initial years, and finally produced “Men and Women,” which won him wide recognition in 1855. He completed his most ambitious and perhaps the greatest work “The Ring and the Book” in 1869. It received much recognition in the literary circles of England in 1881, when the Browning Society was established. After winning wide popularity, Browning produced his major work “Parleyings with Certain People of Importance in Their Day” in 1887. It was a unique piece of work in that it even baffled the Victorian audience. Browning wrote profusely, and his most popular plays include “Pippa Passes,” “Strafford,” “King Victor and King Charles,” “A Blot in the Scutcheon,” “The Return of the Druses,” and “Colombe’s Birthday,” while his popular dramatic monologues are “Rabbi Ben Ezra,” “Fifine at the Fair,” and “My Last Duchess.”

Robert Browning’s Style and Popular Poems
Browning’s style of writing mainly relies on dramatic monologues, in which the actions, settings, and characters are revealed through their own words. However, this revelation is not done deliberately but inadvertently as the speaker reveals himself and his past actions through images and symbols. His most popular poems include “A Wall,” “A Tale,” “A Pretty Woman,” “My Last Duchess,” “Soliloquy of the Spanish Cloister,” “The Last Ride Together,” “The Last Leader,” and “The Laboratory and Meeting at Night.”

More about His Life
Robert Browning won several awards, including an honorary doctorate fromEdinburgh. He got offers of being Lord Rectorship of Glasgow and Life Governor of London University, but he turned down several other offers. His last collection of poems, “Asolando,” which employed concise lyric, was published in 1889 on the day of his death.

Works : 
Henry van Dyke
Robert W. Service
William Butler Yeats
Lord Byron
Langston Hughes
Eugene Field
Claude McKay
Dorothy Parker
Alicia Elsbeth Stallings
Amber Flora Thomas
Robert Burns

Diffrence between Both Poet.

The mood and concerns of the Victorian age are revived here through the poetry of Tennyson, Arnold and Browning. The editor's perspective introduction probes the psychological alienation and isolation of the Victorian poets, explores the influences the Romantics had upon their poetry, and demonstrates how the Victorians moved the poetic tradition toward the twentieth century. Included are biographical sketches of each poet, bibliographical notes and critical annotations.

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.

As a consequence of rapid scientific and industrial progress or the theories of Evolution and Communism, Victorian people and of course the literary writers are consigned to reach the acme of religious confusion or spiritual loss or conflict between faith and doubt. It is an admitted fact that the Victorian people and writers are divided into two idealistic worlds. So if one group goes in the favor of faith or religion, the other is of course in the favor of doubt. So conflict in ideologies is a must.

As much ink is spilled overwriting or enough debate is tabled regarding this very issue, the topic conflict between faith and doubt or science and religious places in the different sorts of Victorian literary devices especially in the Victorian poetry as “Poetry is the criticism of life.”6 This is because, Hugh Walker comments; ‘it is curious that in the year 1850 both Tennyson and Browning produced poems in which the religious element is more prominent than it is in anything they had previously written.” 7 Needless to say hundreds of books like ”History of the Conflict between Religion and Science” (1875), Origin of Species (1859) and” The Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom (1876) by John Draper, Andrew  Whites, and Charles Darwin respectively are written on this conflict. This is why, being the children of the time, Matthew Arnold, Robert Browning, Alfred Tennyson and Cristina Rosette’s poetry started concerning with this very conflict and of course it becomes the mirror on which Victorian faith and doubt are clearly reflected. To lament on the loss of faith, Matthew Arnold “who chastises and instructs the reader on contemporary  social issues,”8 says in his poem :

“The Sea of Faith

Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore

Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.

But now I only hear

Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,

Retreating, to the breath

Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear

And naked shingles of the world”.

(Dover Beach, Line: 21- 28 )

In these quoted lines, making an explicit comparison between Victorian religious faith and sea, Arnold, in truth, laments over the transition from the age of faith into the age of skepticism, uncertainty or turbulence. The sea of faith, to Arnold, was full in past. It had flown with great energy and left it vigorous waves on the seashore. But now the poet hears the melancholic sounds of withdrawing waves. More clearly, religious faith of the Victorian people is replaced by agnostic, atheistic or skeptic thoughts.

Alfred Lord Tennyson is considered to be one of the most well-liked British poets during more of Queen Victorian period 9 questions faith in God, in nature and even in scientific without any hesitancy in his poetry. In the truest sense of the term, we observe that Tennyson possesses mixed feeling about scientific progress. This is why, Tennyson acknowledged evolution as progress and concerned about this conflict with the Christian scripture theory of creation like most of the Victorian people whose faith is being tempted by Charles Darwin’s  theory of Natural Selection.

In this connection, Tennyson sometimes goes in the favors of religion and same times is in the favor of doubt or religion. He is, actually, in between. This is because, Tennyson exposes his sufferings from the conflict of faith and doubt in his poetry. In the poems ‘The Lotos-Eaters’ “and ‘Locksley Hall’ the speakers are wild to abandon modern society and return to a savage lifestyle in the jungle. In the poem, ‘In Memoriam’ the Victorian poet concerns with this idea saying

“We have but faith we cannot know….

 For knowledge,…”

( In Memoriam: Line: 21-22)

But in every poem, Tennyson seems to arrive at the conclusion that we should have faith in scientific progression and of course in our religion.He is, in fact, reluctant to reject belief and to accept knowledge as the path of solution for the Victorian crisis of faith. In truth, he is keen to reconcile Victorian belief with knowledge. So it can be noted that Tennyson wants to solve the problem originated from the Victorian conflicts of faith and doubt reconciling his faith with knowledge. In a similar manner, the Victorian crisis of faith and doubt has clearly appeared in the poetry of Elizabeth  Barret Browning, one of the most prominent of the Victorian poets.  Her very poem ‘The Cry of the Children’ speaks about the suffering and faithlessness of the Victorian people through child labor. Even though Matthew Arnold’s poem ‘Dover Beach’  discusses the Victorian crisis of faith from the spiritual point of view. Elizabeth Barret Browning’s poem ‘The Cry of the Children’ concerns with this very issue from the practical point of view. Children ask help to God but he doesn’t pay need to them.

“Is it likely God, with any around Him,

Hears our weeping anymore”

( Line: 227-228 )

But this scene is somewhat different for the dead girl. She looks happier because she is now out the industrially developed Victorian society. And she has not been compelled to do a lot of work in mills and factories around fourteen to fifteen hours with little wages. In truth, the children symbolize the working class people, the worst sufferers of the Victorian society. This industrial unscrupulous society is established through the blood and sweat of the working classes people. Truly, the children are innocent but they are forced to go against the God. As the poem states:

“How long,” they say, “how long, O cruel nation,

   Will you stand, to move the world, on a child’s heart, —

                          (‘The Cry of the Children’: Stanza: xiii, Line: 33-34)

This is because, the faith of Victorian children declines. Again the poet says:

“But, no !” say the children, weeping faster,

      ” He is speechless as a stone;…..

Do not mock us; grief has made us unbelieving —

   We look up for God, but tears have made us blind.”

Do ye hear the children weeping and disproving,”

          (‘The Cry of the Children’: Stanza: xi, Line: 125-126 &131-133)

Here, we are not considering all Victorian people to be atheist. Because loss of faith doesn’t mean atheism.  It, to us, means the Victorian conflict between faith and doubt. Because scientific discoveries, industrialization, and the theory of evolution and communism make the people skeptic regarding religion and even in science.

Reference

1. https://www.slideshare.net/mobile/JyotibaGohil/comparison-between-robert-browning-and-alfred-tennyson

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Browning

3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred,_Lord_Tennyson







Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Deconstruction

Monday, 20 - January - 2020
Deconstruction

Hello Reader...

Today I'm sharing one more Blog about Deconstruction. This blog task is about how apply Deconstruction in movies, poems, novel or any book which we like. And we all are try to apply Deconstruction in this things. This is our today's take by Sir. ( Click here ) .


# Dictionary meaning of Deconstruction.

A method of critical analysis of philosophical and literary language that emphasizes the language and conceptual systems of internal workings, the meaning of the relational quality, and the assumptions implicit in the expression of forms.

Deconstruction is a Poststructuralist theory based on largely but not exclusively on the writings of Derrida. It is in the first instance a philosophical theory and a theory directed towards the rereading of Philosophical writings. On the fact that Deconstruction sees all writing as a complex historical, Cultural process rooted in the relations of texts to each other and in the institutions and conventions of writing and on the sophistication and intensity of it's sense that human knowledge is not as controllable or as convincing Western thought would have it and that language operates is subtle and often Contradictory ways, so that certainty will always elude us.

Deconstruction involves the close reading of texts in order to demonstrate that any given text has irreconcilably contradictory meanings, rather than being a unified, logical whole.

Derrida suggests these oppositions are hierarchies in miniature, containing one term that Western culture views as positive or superior and another considered negative or inferior, even if only slightly so. Through deconstruction, Derrida aims to erase the boundary between binary oppositions—and to do so in such a way that the hierarchy implied by the oppositions is thrown into question.

Deconstruction was both created and has been profoundly influenced by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Derrida, who coined the term deconstruction, argues that in Western culture, people tend to think and express their thoughts in terms of binary oppositions (white / black, masculine / feminine, cause /effect, conscious /unconscious, presence / absence, speech writing).

As J. Hillis Miller, the preeminent American deconstructionist, has explained in an essay entitled Stevens’ Rock and Criticism as Cure (1976), “Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text, but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself. Its apparently solid ground is no rock but thin air.”

&

I try to apply Deconstruction in both movies. Plot of the movies are diffrent from each other. Both movie narrated by any person who was the main actor in the movie. And some ways both movies based on study. In 3 Idiots movie Aamir Khan play a lead character and he think positive way in study. With our positive thoughts, can we take the first rank in the exam? 

If answer is 'No' than how can Aamir Khan got first rank in exam with his positive thinking. And we can also told that this movie also is a kind of love story, Because you also find romantic song in the movie and no end of the movie comes only after meeting the hero and heroine Aamir Khan and Kareena Kapoor. So you can call it a romantic movie.

Second movie is 2 States. The Two States movie is a romantic movie, but both the heroes and the heroin may have resorted to the study to meet the film maker. But in this movie, the importance of study is taken and study is given importance. It is also narrated by Arjun Kapoor. And although the customs of these two regions are different, the parents of the two are finally considered for marriage.

If we do not take this plot, we can look the other way. In this movie, love is given more importance at first, but then the importance of study increases. When Arjun meets Alia's father, we can also watch the movie at the base of the study.









Friday, January 10, 2020

Structuralism

Tuesday, 09 - 01 - 2020
Structuralism 

Hello Reader...

Welcome to all Reader on my blogspot. Today I present this blog with the example of movie, novel, poem and etc. things. Our Professor Dr. Dilip Barad sir giving that type of blog task for new learning methods and peoples use this method in his or her learning. So he try to do this and one day he is successful in his this mission and students and parents both are being learner in this method. So people use those things and gaine knowledge. This new learner method is so much use full for alla and everyone join this and also write and the excess anywhere for learning things.

Today's my blog about the Structuralism. Click here for Dr.Dilipsir's blogspot. This method use for looking things.

What is Structuralism?
According to me Structuralism means connection between words and emotions, hints and signs.

# According to dictionary :
A method of interpretation and analysis of aspects of human cognition, behaviour, culture, and experience, which focuses on relationships of contrast between elements in a conceptual system.

• The doctrine that structure is more important than function.

# Definition
Structuralism as a method is peculiarly imitable to literary criticism which is a discourse upon a discourse.

• Firstly, he emphasize that the meanings we give to words are purely arbitrary and these meaning are maintained by convention only. There is no inherent connection between a word and what it designates. Structuralist were interested in implication that if language as a sign says is based on arbitrariness of this kind then it follows that language isn't a reflection of the world and of experience but a says which stands quite separate frame it.
i.e,
Sign - Signifier - Signified
Dog : Image of 4 legs animal, pets animal, and also faithful to human. And help to other.

• Secondly, He emphasized that the meanings of words are relational. i.e, no words can be define in isolation form other words. All the meanings depends on other 'adjoining' words. i.e. Train on 8.25 Bhavngar to Surendranagar. And we show one other example in gujarati is " on bus station = 'છ ની બસ ગઈ?".

Thirdly, language 'constructs' our world - it does not just record or label it. Meaning is always attributed to the object or idea by the human mind, and constructed by and expressed within the things.
i.e. freedom fighters = terrorist.
                           Sign. = Mental horizon.


It has been said that there are three vision of every story.
1. Your vision
2. My vision and ,
3. The Truth.
But the case here is more complicated than that, since all the available terms are purely linguistic. There is no Truth..... Outside of the language.

# Important concepts in Genette's narratology.

Genette's narratology is derived from Narrative Discourse; An Essay in Method. Below are the five main concepts used by Genette in Narrative Discourse; An Essay in Method. They are often used to look at the syntax of narratives, rather than to perform an interpretation of them.

1. Order
2. Frequency 
3. Duration
4. Voice
5. Mood


I try to apply all this methods in the movie 3 Idiots movie. This story about three Idiots who is living there life with full of problems and they survive with joy and happiness. This story narrate by Farhan (R. Madhavan) and he have best friends is Raju ( Sharman Joshi) and Rancho ( Aamir Khan). R. Madhavan narrate this story. 




In this story starting with the ending scene. The order of the story is


Sunday, January 5, 2020

Northrop Frye

Northrop Frye's essay The Architype of literature.
Sunday, 06 - 01 - 2020.

Hello Reader...

Today I'm present one more Blog on Northrop Frye. This blog task given by our professor Dilip Barad sir about Northrop Frye's essay on The Architype of Literature.
In literary criticism the term Archetypes denotes recurrent narratives designs, patterns of action, character types, themes, and images which are identifiable in a wide variety of works of literature.




Herman Northrop Frye (July 14, 1912 – January 23, 1991) was a Canadian literary critic and literary theorist, considered one of the most influential of the 20th century.
Frye rose to international prominence as a result of his first book, Fearful Symmetry, published in 1947. Until then, the prophetic poetry of William Blake had long been poorly understood, and considered by some to be delusional ramblings. Frye found in it a system of metaphor derived from Paradise Lost and the Bible.
In 1974–1975 Frye was the Norton professor at Harvard University. But his primary position was as a professor at the University of Toronto, and then chancellor of Victoria College in the University of Toronto.Northrop Frye did not have a Ph.D.
The intelligence service of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police spied on Frye, watching his participation in the anti-Vietnam War movement, an academic forum about China, and activism to end South African apartheid.

Question - 1 : 

What is Archetypal Criticism?  What does the archetypal critic do? 


Archetypal criticism as it applies to literature is a form of criticism "that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths and archetypes."
It was most popular during the 50's and 60's; this would have been the later part of Jung's lifetime. His work, along with other psychologist and philosophers created the ideas behind archetypal criticism.Rather than looking at the other aspects of the literary work itself, this type of criticism focuses on just the archetypes present.

However, you asked specifically about Carl Jung who was a psychologist. In this case, archetypes are usually referring to a specific behavior exhibited by a certain type of person rather than a literary example. Archetypal criticism isn't often used as a form of literary criticism now days.

Archetypes are "an original model of a person, ideal example, or a prototype upon which others are copied, patterned, or emulated." With regards to literature, this usually refers to ancient models like those from myths.He interprets literature in the light of various rituals and myths. Frye has divided  the easy into three parts. 

• The First deals with the concept of archetypal criticism. 

• The second of part throws light on the inductive method of analysis of a text. 


• The third part focuses on the deductive method of analysis. All the method fall under  structural criticism.


Question - 2 :
what is Frye trying prove by giving an analogy of 'physics to nature ' and 'Criticism to literature? 

Criticism so far ranks only as a subdivision of literature; and hence, for the systematic mental organization of the subject, the student has to turn to the conceptual framework of the historian for events, and to that of the philosopher for ideas. Even the more centrally placed critical sciences, such as textual editing, seem to be part of a “‘background” that recedes into history or some other non-literary field. The thought suggests itself that the ancillary critical disciplines may be related to a central expanding pattern of systematic comprehension which has not yet been established, but which, if it were established, would prevent them from being centrifugal. If such a pattern exists, then criticism would be to art what philosophy is to wisdom and history to action.

Q - 3 : Share your views of criticism as an organized body of knowledge. Mention relation of literature with history and philosophy. 

Every organized body of knowledge can be learned progressively; and experience shows that there is also something progressive about the learning of literature. Physics is an organized body of knowledge about nature, and a student of it says that he is learning physics, not that he is learning nature. Art, like nature, is the subject of a systematic study, and has to be distinguished from the study itself, which is criticism. It is therefore impossible to “learn literature”: one learns about it in a certain way, but what one learns, transitively, is the criticism of literature.

Question - 4 : 
Briefly explain inductive method with illustration of Shakespeare's  Hamlet Grave Digger's scenes. 

Hamlet is the great novel written by Shakespeare. Frye's concept is good to understand this book and also his method is also best fo understanding this book very deeply. Inductive method was mostly used by writer. Both method are best understand with this book. In this method specifies a journey from specific to general. Hamlet is the great book is full of sad emotions, unfaithfulness and etc. In the grave digging scene in Hamlet is a specifics scene, we made the general conclusion like, grave digger scene is centrifugal which moves us away from center. In this scene Grave Digging was effected by the death of others. It is manifestation of the absolute integrity of gravedigger. They have romanticized relationship with their jobs. We came to general observation that the corruption in society. They introduced different skull with person and their works.



https://sejalnsolanki.blogspot.com/2020/01/literature-and-religion.html?m=1


Literature and Religion

Literature and Religion
Sunday, 05 - January - 2020

Hello Reader....

Today I'm sharing one more Blog with you. My today's topic is Religion and Literature. Literature gives us many things and give values and liberation. But Religion not give that type of liberation and Bondage us.


The English word ' religion ' is beloved to have been derived from the Latin root ' ligare ' which means " bind , connect " etc. It is prefixed by ' re ' meaning ' again '. Thus the world ' religion ' means ' to reconnect'. This Latin word ' religio ' means ' reverence for God, careful pondering of divine things ' etc. Thus the word religion means that which connects us to God and the practices related to divine things. 

As we know at our birth time we belong to the Religion of our parents. At home we learn the daily practices, prayers and methods of worship from our parents and elders. As we grow older we come to know about other religions as well from our friends, teachers and other sources. In a country like ours, where there is diversity of Culture, languages and religions, it is necessary for us to learn about other religions. For a peaceful co-existence and other growth of our nation we all should learn to respect the religious beliefs of others. 

Sach one's argument is justified, because each one is speaking from his own experience. But he should know that others are also speaking from their experience and their arguments are also justified. The different religions are like these different ways of communicating with god. Every Religion has its own unique way of helping people 'talk' or 'relate' to God. 


Each of of the paths may have it's its own uniqueness. Also those who took each of the ways many argue tha his way the best. But what did he know about other ways? Each path is unique, but it does not mean that the other path taken by another traveller is wrong. This different paths are the different religions.

If you want to communicate with your friends, there are different methods. You can talk in person, write a letter, send a SMS, chat online etc. Each of these methods may have its own advantage and disadvantages, but they all serve the purpose of communicating with your friends. Each one may feel that his method is the best but objectively each one is the best, good and unique. 

The relation of criticism to religion, when they deal with the same documents, is more complicated. In criticism, as in history, the divine is always treated as a human artifact. It is at this point that we can see how religious conceptions of the final cause of human effort are as relevant as any others to criticism.

God for the critic, whether he finds him in Paradise Lost or the Bible, is a character in a human story; and for the critic all epiphanies are explained, not in terms of the riddle of a possessing god or devil, but as mental phenomena closely associated in their origin with dreams. We have identified the central myth of literature, in its narrative aspect, with the quest-myth. Now if we wish to see this central myth as a pattern of meaning also, we have to start with the workings of the subconscious where the epiphany originates, in other words in the dream.

This once established, it is then necessary to say that nothing in criticism or art compels the critic to take the attitude of ordinary waking consciousness towards the dream or the god. Art deals not with the real but with the conceivable; and criticism, though it will eventually have to have some theory of conceivability, can never be justified in trying to develop, much less assume, any theory of actuality. It is necessary to understand this before our next and final point can be made.

The human cycle of waking and dreaming corresponds closely to the natural cycle of light and darkness, and it is perhaps in this correspondence that all imaginative life begins. The correspondence is largely an antithesis: it is in daylight that man is really in the power of darkness, a prey to frustration and weakness; it is in the darkness of nature that the “libido” or conquering heroic self awakes. Hence art, which Plato called a dream for awakened minds, seems to have as its final cause the resolution of the antithesis, the mingling of the sun and the hero, the realizing of a world in which the inner desire and the outward circumstance coincide. 

This is the same goal, of course, that the attempt to combine human and natural power in ritual has. The social function of the arts, therefore, seems to be closely connected with visualizing the goal of work in human life. So in terms of significance, the central myth of art must be the vision of the end of social effort, the innocent world of fulfilled desires, the free human society. Once this is understood, the integral place of criticism among the other social sciences, in interpreting and systematizing the vision of the artist, will be easier to see.

In last , summarising this God is just thing not anything. People just believe in that power. But many people are not believing in that and they believe on his or her own. And Literature helps for understanding of this unbelievable things. People things that this divine helps us in everything , so they believe but some are not believing in that because they learn and they believe on his own and also on knowledge of Literature and those people question this divine. 


Sunday, December 29, 2019

Cultural Studies

# Workshop on Cultural Studies
# Guest lecture by Kalyanimam Vallath




Hello Reader...
Today I'm present one more blog about Cultural Studies. Our Professor Dr. Dilip Darad sir organised session on Cultural Studies by Kalyanimam Vallath from Kerala. She have her own coaching centre Vallath TES in kerala and Kalkatta. Our professor Dr. Dilip sir organised her session at Department of English ( MKB Uni.) , Bhavnagar. In that session we learned about Cultural Studies and also she gave Information about NET & SET exam.


In this session she gave lots of information about Cultural Studies and NET & SET exam during her wonderful session. Cultural Studies simple meaning is who I'm ? And what I'm? 


1). What is your understanding about the concept of the Cultural Studies?
Answer
Cultural Studies related with Interdisciplin , larger society, individual experience , social theory , philosophy, social relatives, power relation, history , media, medical , politics, and linguistics. Cultural Studies means what I'm? and who I'm? Cultural Studies.


2). How would you explain a layman about Cultural Studies?
3). If you are asked on interview to teach Cultural Studies - how would you introduce it? 
As per my answer of Cultural Studies I tell them what we are and what is our space and how they survive in this world with rules and regulations that is Cultural Studies.

4). How many examples from the session were so catchy that you will never forget it? Write about it.
In her whole session she gave lots of example of her life, event, movie , drama , book. One example she give is " Shakespeare like 'sari' means Shakespeare represent the England, he try to express Culture of England.

Thank you....


Wednesday, December 25, 2019

Friendship

# Task given by Vaidehi Mam
# For Showing our Grammar mistake and writing.



Friendship is a relaxing of mutual affection between people. Friendship is a stronger form of if interpersonal bond than an association. Friendship has been studied in academic fields such as communication , sociology, social psychology, anthorpology and philosophy. Various academic theories of friendship have been proposed , including social exchange theory , equity theory ,relational dialectics and attachment styles.

Friendship is born in a million different ways, and all good friends strive to achieve the same goal to be a source of love and support. Finding a true friend feels like a gift that keeps on giving , even when they are thousands miles away. Through stressful classes, figuring out a career, and inevitable breakups, your best friends have been there. And yes, when you got those bangs you shouldn't have tried in the first place they consoled you.

Whatever

Monday, December 23, 2019

Shashi Tharoor

# Sahitya Academy 
# Thinking Activity 



Hello Reader....

I am back again to talk about a blog with you on Sahitya Academy award 2019. Shashi tharoor. This Blog task Given by our Professor Dr. Dilip Barad sir. Click here to visit Dr. Dilip sir's blog. He is giving that types of blog task for gaining some knowledge and have information about that.

Shashi Tharoor was born on 09- March - 1956 in London , England. He is the Prominent Indian diplomat and Politician who after along service in the international diplomatic crops, became an official in the government of India. He was also a highly regarded author of both nonfiction and fiction books.

He also serves as Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs.Tharoor began as a career diplomat with the United Nations and went on to become its Vice-Secretary General. After contesting an election to the Secretary General's office unsuccessfully in 2006, he left the multilateral agency. He secured the Congress ticket from the Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha constituency in 2009 amid a lot of opposition from the Kerala wing of the party. He was in the news a couple of years ago after he won a debate at Oxford arguing that the British must pay reparations to its former colonies.

Tharoor won the election and was made a Minister of State for External Affairs in the Manmohan Singh Cabinet in the United Progressive Alliance I (UPA I) government. Despite being embroiled in a host of controversies, related to sweat equity in an Indian Premier League team and the suspicious death of his wife Sunanda Pushkar, Tharoor won a second term in 2014.

As he is quite popular among the urban youth, it will be interesting to watch how well he can pull that section of the electorate towards the Congress in Kerala.

Shashi Tharoor is the bestselling author of fifteen previous books, both fiction and non-fiction, besides being a noted critic and columnist. His books include the path-breaking satire The Great Indian Novel (1989), the classic India: From Midnight to the Millennium (1997), and most recently, India Shastra: Reflections on the Nation in Our Time (2015). He was a former Under Secretary-General of the United Nations and a former Minister of State for Human Resource Development and Minister of State for External Affairs in the Government of India. He is a two-time member of the Lok Sabha from Thiruvananthapuram and chairs Parliament’s External Affairs Committee. He has won numerous literary awards, including a Commonwealth Writers’ Prize, and was honoured as New Age Politician of the Year (2010) by NDTV. He was awarded the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman, India’s highest honour for overseas Indians.

Tharoor has kicked up quite a few controversies over the years. When Pranab Mukherjee initiated an austerity drive during UPA I, the former diplomat was found staying in a 5-star hotel for weeks. On Twitter, he ruffled feathers when he said he

"would travel cattle class out of solidarity with all our holy cows".

He was in the news a couple of years ago after he won a debate at Oxford arguing that the British must pay reparations to its former colonies of 18 bestselling works of fiction and non-fiction, Tharoor has been a vocal critic of the Narendra Modi government. He also penned a book recently about the failures of the present dispensation at the Centre.

Shashi Tharoor An author, politician, and former international civil servant, Shashi Tharoor straddles several worlds of experience. Currently a third-term Lok Sabha MP representing the Thiruvananthapuram constituency and Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs, he has previously served as Minister of State for Human Resource Development and Minister of State for External Affairs in the Government of India. During his nearly three-decade long prior career at the United Nations, he served as a peacekeeper, refugee worker, and administrator at the highest levels, serving as Under-Secretary General during Kofi Annan's leadership of the organisation.

This book was published in 2017.  This was written in post colonial context. How the British empire is ruled on Indian people And also the thing is that how they make disastrous effect on in Indian Economy. In his interview we find that many argument that I like the most.

Videos of Shashi Tharoor.



That all are videos about Shashi Tharoor and he give speech about Looking Back at the British Raj in India: The University of Edinburgh.

He is write many books like An Dark Era of Inglorious empires.



In 1930, the American historian and philosopher Will Durant wrote that Britain’s ‘conscious and deliberate bleeding of India… [was the] greatest crime in all history’. He was not the only one to denounce the rapacity and cruelty of British rule, and his assessment was not exaggerated. Almost thirty-five million Indians died because of acts of commission and omission by the British—in famines, epidemics, communal riots and wholesale slaughter like the reprisal killings after the 1857 War of Independence and the Amritsar massacre of 1919. Besides the deaths of Indians, British rule impoverished India in a manner that beggars belief. When the East India Company took control of the country, in the chaos that ensued after the collapse of the Mughal empire, India’s share of world GDP was 23 per cent. When the British left it was just above 3 per cent.

The British empire in India began with the East India Company, incorporated in 1600, by royal charter of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth I, to trade in silk, spices and other profitable Indian commodities. Within a century and a half, the Company had become a power to reckon with in India. In 1757, under the command of Robert Clive, Company forces defeated the ruling Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula of Bengal at Plassey, through a combination of superior artillery and even more superior chicanery. A few years later, the young and weakened Mughal emperor, Shah Alam II, was browbeaten into issuing an edict that replaced his own revenue officials with the Company’s representatives. Over the next several decades, the East India Company, backed by the British government, extended its control over most of India, ruling with a combination of extortion, double-dealing, and outright corruption backed by violence and superior force. This state of affairs continued until 1857, when large numbers of the Company’s Indian soldiers spearheaded the first major rebellion against colonial rule. After the rebels were defeated, the British Crown took over power and ruled the country ostensibly more benignly until 1947, when India won independence.

In this explosive book, bestselling author Shashi Tharoor reveals with acuity, impeccable research, and trademark wit, just how disastrous British rule was for India. Besides examining the many ways in which the colonizers exploited India, ranging from the drain of national resources to Britain, the destruction of the Indian textile, steel-making and shipping industries, and the negative transformation of agriculture, he demolishes the arguments of Western and Indian apologists for Empire on the supposed benefits of British rule, including democracy and political freedom, the rule of law, and the railways. The few unarguable benefits—the English language, tea, and cricket—were never actually intended for the benefit of the colonized but introduced to serve the interests of the colonizers. Brilliantly narrated and passionately argued, An Era of Darkness will serve to correct many misconceptions about one of the most contested periods of Indian history.

#Review of the Book.

‘Gifted writing, masses of dexterously marshaled information, pithily summarized ideas and a sharp debating style, which fences more with the sword than with the shield, make for riveting reading. Professors writing on colonial exploitation have suffered from the sadness of their subject. Tharoor makes it fun. By far the liveliest recent exposition of the traditional Indian nationalist viewpoint, his book can be recommended unhesitatingly…’
—India Today

‘Shashi Tharoor’s latest, An Era of Darkness, is one breathless read…Until [this book] came along, there was no single work that clearly and unambiguously catalogued all the harm done to India under British rule.’ —Business Line ‘The book serves to correct many misconceptions about one of the most contested periods of Indian history’.
—Deccan Chronicle

‘[Tharoor] has produced a bestseller that will re-ignite thinking and debate and open the eyes of the younger generation in India and hopefully in Britain on this “era of darkness’…Tharoor’s new contribution is that he even takes apart the commonly accepted argument…that the British Empire left quite a bit of good in India…’
—Business Standard

‘By rewriting the history of the British Raj as it really was, Tharoor has lifted a great load from millions of still-colonised minds in this country; while simultaneously providing an opportunity to the heirs of carpetbaggers and adventurers of the Raj to atone and apologize.’
—Education World

‘Tharoor reveals with acuity, impeccable research, and trademark wit, just how disastrous British rule was for India’
—The Sunday Guardian

‘Tharoor’s arguments have smashed to smithereens the claim that the British prepared India for a system of parliamentary democracy and laid the foundation for the rule of law…we all should be grateful to Tharoor for writing a book of enduring value, and it will be desirable to see it translated into different Indian languages as it is of interest to the public at large.’
—Frontline

‘Tharoor’s thrusts are painful, and his approach is that of a shrewd debater—which Tharoor excels at—attacking each proclaimed virtue from all fronts, leaving the supporter of the empire defenceless. He shows—with facts and statistics—how post-independence India has made rapid strides in economic and social development, which were simply impossible during the colonial era, and without stressing on the point too loudly, reminds the reader how much more India could have achieved had it been able to modernize without colonial subjugation’ —LiveMint

‘The reality is, as Tharoor points out, that “we were one of the richest countries in the world when the British came in but when they left us, we were one of the poorest.”
 —Mail Today

In An Era of Darkness, consummate debater and author Shashi Tharoor recreates the British Raj with all its horrors and also elucidates the awe-inspiring struggle of India's freedom fighters. He gives us a valuable insight on how dark forces operate and on who are harbingers of hope—it's a valuable lesson at a time when thugs are masquerading as our saviours…at a time when debate has been reduced to a cacophony of slogans and insults by bhakts, Tharoor's writing, with its expansive case studies and citations and sustained argument, all augmented by his felicity of language, may just come as an eye-opener to us all.
—Huffington Post






Sunday, December 22, 2019

John Keats

# John Keats
# Thinking Activity
# Paper -2 Romantic Literature


Hello Reader....

I welcome to all Reader on my blog. Today I'm write about John Keats and his poem on death and also some other writers poems. This blog task given by our Professor Dr. Heenaba Zala , click here for her blog post on John Keats. Today I'm talking about the concept of Death from his poems.

# Information about John Keats
Along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, John Keats was one of the most prominent figures of the second generation of English Romantic poets. Keats died due to tuberculosis in 1821 at the age of only 25. His work was in publication for only four years and it was not generally well received by critics during his lifetime. The most famous and acclaimed poems of Keats are a series of six odes known as the Odes of 1819. However, his reputation grew after his death and by the end of the 19th century, he became one of the most beloved of all English poets.  Through his 1819 odes, Keats created a new type of short lyrical poem, which influenced later generations.The most highly regarded among these is To Autumn, which has been called one of the most perfect short poems in the English language.

# Concept of Death.

Death is not end of anything but death is the starting of everything. Death is not stopping life but death is starting new life. Death is the symbol of New starting. As North of Fray told in his eassy the concept of Tragedy is like Winter , because it is the fall of natura and we are also told that Death of things, but as we know cycle can't stop after this fall and Winter, Spring is come and Spring is the symbol of Birth. So that cycle of natura also follow that rules. And as we also know Death is the Bitter truth and people can't accept that Truth.

But Literature give permission to write about the Death and many writer wrote about the Death.

For the better understanding about the Death I paste here Video link.


After the understanding of Death I talk about what is the space in Literature.

Now I'm taking about the John Keats's Poem La Belle dame sans Merci.

O what can ail thee, knight-at-arms,
       Alone and palely loitering?
The sedge has withered from the lake,
      And no birds sing.


O what can ail thee, knight-at-arms,
       So haggard and so woe-begone?
The squirrel’s granary is full,
       And the harvest’s done.


I see a lily on thy brow,
       With anguish moist and fever-dew,
And on thy cheeks a fading rose
       Fast withereth too.


I met a lady in the meads,
       Full beautiful—a faery’s child,
Her hair was long, her foot was light,
       And her eyes were wild.


I made a garland for her head,
       And bracelets too, and fragrant zone;
She looked at me as she did love,
       And made sweet moan


I set her on my pacing steed,
       And nothing else saw all day long,
For sidelong would she bend, and sing
       A faery’s song.


She found me roots of relish sweet,
       And honey wild, and manna-dew,
And sure in language strange she said—
       ‘I love thee true’.


She took me to her Elfin grot,
       And there she wept and sighed full sore,
And there I shut her wild wild eyes
       With kisses four.


And there she lullèd me asleep,
       And there I dreamed—Ah! woe betide!
The latest dream I ever dreamt
       On the cold hill side.


I saw pale kings and princes too,
       Pale warriors, death-pale were they all;
They cried—‘La Belle Dame sans Merci
       Thee hath in thrall!’


I saw their starved lips in the gloam,
       With horrid warning gapèd wide,
And I awoke and found me here,
       On the cold hill’s side.


And this is why I sojourn here,
       Alone and palely loitering,
Though the sedge is withered from the lake,
       And no birds sing.

“La Belle Dame sans Merci” as a Representative of Deception: 

La Belle dame sans Merci" ( the beautiful lady without mercy) is a Ballad produced by the English poet John Keats in 1819. The title of the 15th - century Poem by Alain Chartier called La Belle Dame Sans Merci.

The poem narrates a tragic story of a knight who falls in love with a lady, but she leaves him as falls ill. A stranger meets the knight and inquires about his miserable condition. The knight tells him about the beautiful woman in the meadows. They have been in love as she has walked alongside him and sung beautiful songs for him. Once, she took him to her special place where he kissed her, and the calmness around made him sleep. He then dreamed strange people warning him about that fair lady. He woke up by the cold hillside where the stranger found him. The tragic ballad tells about the sad condition of the knight and the deception of the lady.

Metaphor: It is a figure of speech in which an implied comparison is made between the objects that are different in nature. For example, “I see a lily on thy brow”. Here the paleness is compared to a white lily.

Symbolism: Symbolism means to use symbols to signify ideas and qualities, giving them symbolic meanings different from literal meanings. The phrases such as; “no birds sing”, “lily on thy brow” and “fading rose” symbolize the arrival of death.

Imagery: Imagery is used to make readers perceive things involving their five senses. For example, “She took me to her Elfin grot”, “I saw pale kings and princes too” and “And there she wept and sighed full sore.”

After that example I give more examples about the death. Click Here for the death poems written by many famous writer.



Thank you.....

Reference
1. B.A material.
2 YouTube
3. Pic: Wikipedia
  https://www.yourquote.in/sejal_solanki31
4. https://dilipbarad.blogspot.com/2013/01/ma-english-study-material-reading.html?m=1








Sunday, December 15, 2019

Indian Poetics by Vinod Joshi

#  Indian Poetics
# Paper-3 Literary Criticism
# Guest Lecture by Vinod Joshi
# Gujarati Famous Writer and Poet.


Hello Reader...
 
    Today I'm writing about our Paper 3 Literary Criticism 's topic Indian Poetics. Our department arrange Guest Lecture for Indian Poetics by Professor Vinod Joshi Sir, he is great gujarati Writer and Poet, Currently he Write grate book 'Sairendhari'
Which is based on Mahabharata story. In that book Dropadi was not subltern but she is a powerful Character in this book.

First day he is starting with introduction of Criticism and Indian Poetics. On this day he talk about Introduction of Indian Poetics and about Muni like Abhinav Gupta , Vaman, Rajshekhar , Jagannath , Aanand vardhan etc.
          " Internal tools help you
             to understand Criticism."
In indian Poetics muni gives 9 Aesthetic for understanding writers feeling and also reader what he feel after read book. As we know Literary criticism is the Literary philosophy. As literature moves us to think and to critique it. It gives us new ideas and moves us to think differently. We gain knowledge and learn to live co-operatively with each other and understand them as co-operating with each other.

ભારતીય વિવેચન આપણને સૂક્ષ્મ અનુસંધાન અને જગત સાથે જોડાવા માટે મદદ કરે છે. આપણો ગમે તેવું કરવાનો અનુરાગ હોય છે અને આપણા ગમા-અણગમા ઉપર એનો આધાર રહેલો હોય છે. આને સમજાવવા માટે ભારતીય કવ્યા શાસ્ત્ર માં વિવેચક એક શ્લોક આપે છે.

कवि करोति काव्यानि, रसोन करोति कल्याणी , तरु सृजति पुष्पाणि।


ભારતીય મીમાંસા નો પ્રારંભ ભરત મુનિ એ કર્યો હતો. ભારતનો સાહિત્યપ્રેમી વિચાર એ રસ હતો. એમજ આનંદવર્ધન નો સાહિત્યપ્રેમી વિચારો ધ્વનિ, કુંતક નો વક્રોક્તિ, વામન નો રિતી, ભામન નો અલંકાર હતા.

Indian poetics is unique in the whole world.

ભાષા વગર વિચાર ના આવી શકે. - Palto
ભાષા પ્રાકૃતિક નથી. ભાષા નો આપડે ઉપયોગ કરીએ છીએ વાતચીત માટે. પ્રાકૃતિક આવાજ છે. ભાષા દ્વારા લાગણી, પીડા વગેરે વ્યક્ત કરી શકાય પણ કોઈ ને એનો અનુભવ ના થઈ શકે. કદાચ ભાષા ના હોત તો માનવી ક્યારેય ખોટું ના બોલી શકતો હોત. આપણે જે અર્થ પહોંચાડીએ તે ભાષા નથી પરંતુ જે બોલીએ છીએ તેના દ્વારા આપડે ખાલી ભાવ પહોંચાડીએ છીએ પણ ભાષા નહિ પહોંચાડી શકતા. આપણે વાત કરીએ ત્યારે આપડે કોઈ ને ભાવ પહોંચાડીએ છીએ ભાષા નહિ. આપડે અર્થ નહિ પરંતુ ભાવ દ્વારા ભાવ પહોંચાડીએ છીએ. ભાવ વિશ્વ એટલે અનુભવ નું વિશ્વ. ભાવ સૃષ્ટિ ને આધારે જ Indian poetics ની રચના કરી હતી. ભરત મુનિ દ્વારા રસ નિષ્પત્તિ ની પ્રક્રિયા વર્ણવી હતી. અને પાણીની દ્વારા વ્યાકરણ શાસ્ત્ર ની રચના કરવામાં આવી.

Language is a Imitation.  - Plato

રસ સંપ્રદાય

રસ સંપ્રદાય ની રચના ભરત મુનિ દ્વારા કરવામાં આવી હતી. અને નાટ્ય શાસ્ત્ર, નાટ્ય રસ , નો પણ તેમને ઉચ્ચાર કરેલો છે. કાવ્ય ને સંસ્કૃત માં સાહિત્ય કહેવાય છે. રસ નિષ્પત્તિ માટે શ્લોક પણ આપવામાં આવ્યો છે.


विभावानु भावव्यभिचारी संयोगात् रसनिष्पतः।

રસ સંપ્રદાય ચાર વિભાગ માં વહેચવામાં આવે છે.
1. વિભાવ
2. અનુભાવ
3. વ્યભિચારી ભાવ / સંચારી ભાવ
4. સંયોગ

1 વિભાવ
- જેના આધારે રસ નિષ્પન્ન થાય તેને વિભાવ કહેવાય. વિભાવ માં પણ અલગ અલગ પ્રકાર જોવા મળે છે. અને તેને અહીંયા ઉદાહરણ દ્વારા કહેવામાં આવ્યું છે.
* આલંબન વિભાવ  : દુષ્યંત અને શકુંતલા.
* ઉદિપન વિભાવ : વાતાવરણ

2. અનુભાવ
- અનુભાવ એટલે જેના દ્વારા પ્રતિક્રિયા જોવા મળે. અનુભાવ એટલે પ્રતિક્રિયા અર્થ પણ આપને લઈ શકીએ છીએ.
એક તરફ થી થતી ક્રિયા પર જે ભાવ જોવા મળે તેને પ્રતિક્રિયા કહેવામાં આવે છે.
* લજ્જા એ પ્રતિક્રિયા છે.

3. વ્યભિચારી ભાવ / સંચારી ભાવ
-  વ્યભિચારી ભાવ / સંચારી ભાવ આ ભાવ માટે એવું કહેવામાં આવે છે કે આ ભાવ આવે અને જાય. આ ભાવ બહુ લાંબા સમય સુધી ટકતો નથી. આ ભાવ ને વહેતો ભાવ પણ કહેવામાં આવે છે.

4. સંયોગ
- વિભાવ, અનુભાવ, વ્યભિચારી ભાવ / સંચારી ભાવ આ ત્રણેય ભાવ ના મિશ્રણ ને સંયોગ કહેવામાં આવે છે. આ ત્રણેય ભાવ ના સંયોગ ને થાય ત્યારે રસ નિષ્પત્તિ થાય છે. સંયોગ પરથી સંયોજન શબ્દ આવેલો છે.
* બાળક નું હસવું એ એના વિચાર માં નહિ પરંતુ એ દોષારોપણ થાય છે.

રસ ને નવ પ્રકાર માં વહેંચવા માં આવે છે. રસ એ સર્વસ્વ છે.
1. રતિ - શૃંગાર રસ
2. શોક - કરૂણ રસ
3. ઉત્સાહ - વીર રસ
4. ક્રોધ - રૌદ્ર રસ
5. હાસ્ય - હાસ્ય રસ
6. ભય - ભયાનક રસ
7. જુગુપ્સા - બીભત્સ રસ
8. વિસ્મય - અદભૂત રસ
9. શમા નિર્વેદ - શાંત રસ


शृंगार करुण विर , रौद्र हास्यं भयानकः ।
बिभंत्साद् भुतशाष्व, नव नाट्यं रसाः स्मृता ।


ચાર આલંકારિક
1. ભટ્ટ લોલ્લાર
2. શ્રી શંકુક
3. ભટ્ટ નાયક
4. અભિનવ ગુપ્ત

1. ભટ્ટ લોલ્લાર
- ભટ્ટ લોલ્લાર ને ઉત્પતિ વાદ તરીકે ઓળખવામાં આવ્યા છે. તેઓ એવું કહે છે કે રસ હોતો જ નથી. પરંતુ રસ ને ઉત્પન્ન કરવો પડે છે. અભિનય કરનાર ને રસ નો અનુભવ થાય છે.

2.  શ્રી શંકુક
-  શ્રી શંકુક એવું કહે છે કે રસ હોતો જ નથી. રસ ની ધારણા કરવી પડે છે. રસ નું અનુમાન કરવું પડે છે. તેમણે સૌંદર્યલક્ષી વિશે એક સિદ્ધાંત આપે છે. અને પ્રતીતિ પણ કરાવે છે. અને તેઓ પ્રતીતિ ના ચાર પ્રકાર આપે છે.
1. અર્થાર્થ પ્રતીતિ ( સંપક પ્રતીતિ )
2. મિથ્યા પ્રતીતિ ( રોલ કરતા રોલ કરનાર નું મહત્વ છે. )
3. સંશય પ્રતીતિ ( શંકા )
4. સાદ્રશ્ય પ્રતીતિ ( સમાનતા )

- અનુમતિ વાદ નો સિદ્ધાંત
- ચિત્ર તોરણ નું ઉદાહરણ

3. ભટ્ટ નાયક
- ભટ્ટ નાયક વિરેચન ની વાત કરી છે. ભટ્ટ નાયક ને એરિસ્ટોટલ ગમતા હતા.
- મૃદાલી - રડાવનાર સ્ત્રી , વિધવા સ્ત્રી, જ્યાં તે પોતાનું રુદન પ્રગટ ના કરી શકે ત્યાં રડવનાર સ્ત્રી ને મૃદાલિ કહેવામાં આવે છે.
- સાધરનીકરણ - રસ નો સૌથી મોટો સંચય છે.

4. અભિનવ ગુપ્ત
- અભિવ્યકિતાવાદ સિધ્ધાંત
- પ્રકાશ આનંદ જ્ઞાન નો અનુભવ આપે છે. રસ ના સિધ્ધાંત માં બધી જ સાહિત્યિક સિદ્ધાંત નો સમાવેશ થાય છે.



Dr. Baba Saheb

 Hello Friends... Welcome to my new blog, but first of  I apologize for not posting blogs in mid time. Today I'm talking about our natio...